freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org

Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current

Go to: [ monthly archives ] [ by author ] [ by date ]

November 2025 Archives by thread

Re: consequences of __FreeBSD_version changes: void (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 02:10:18 UTC)
Why is the DVD image so large?: Dennis Clarke (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 14:06:48 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Lexi Winter (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 14:12:43 UTC)
Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Graham Perrin (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 15:46:44 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Dennis Clarke (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 17:21:38 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomoaki AOKI (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 17:58:10 UTC)
Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: John D Groenveld (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 01:15:37 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Sulev-Madis Silber (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 16:19:36 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Lars Tunkrans (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 20:01:18 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Chris (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:09:27 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomoaki AOKI (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 09:12:32 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomek CEDRO (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 11:31:42 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomoaki AOKI (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 12:59:48 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomek CEDRO (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 15:45:24 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Sulev-Madis Silber (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 17:06:04 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomek CEDRO (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 17:32:59 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomoaki AOKI (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:22:44 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomek CEDRO (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 20:57:55 UTC)
Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomek CEDRO (Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:15:49 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Sulev-Madis Silber (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:42:39 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Lars Tunkrans (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 19:10:14 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Andriy Gapon (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 19:28:53 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Tomek CEDRO (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 18:45:16 UTC)
Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Lars Tunkrans (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 19:44:26 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Chris (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:59:52 UTC)

Re: Why is the DVD image so large?: Lars Tunkrans (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:59:05 UTC)

Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: bob prohaska (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 15:18:29 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: Adrian Chadd (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 15:57:13 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: Mark Millard (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 16:36:41 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: Adrian Chadd (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 17:22:37 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: Mark Millard (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 17:45:18 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: Mark Millard (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 18:26:37 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: Mark Millard (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 18:59:10 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 17:50:42 UTC)
Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: bob prohaska (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 19:07:44 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: bob prohaska (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:47:04 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: Mark Millard (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 16:05:09 UTC)

Re: Buildkernel fails in /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC/vchiq_shim.o: Adrian Chadd (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 16:36:30 UTC)

RFC: NFS over RDMA: Rick Macklem (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 20:11:02 UTC)

Re: RFC: NFS over RDMA: Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 20:49:54 UTC)

Re: RFC: NFS over RDMA: Rick Macklem (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 21:03:59 UTC)

Re: RFC: NFS over RDMA: Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 21:09:51 UTC)

Re: RFC: NFS over RDMA: Rick Macklem (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 21:26:40 UTC)

Re: RFC: NFS over RDMA: John Baldwin (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 14:35:56 UTC)

Re: RFC: NFS over RDMA: Konstantin Belousov (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 19:11:10 UTC)
Re: RFC: NFS over RDMA: Rick Macklem (Tue, 04 Nov 2025 06:10:46 UTC)

Re: RFC: NFS over RDMA: Rick Macklem (Wed, 05 Nov 2025 15:47:48 UTC)

Re: RFC: NFS over RDMA: Rick Macklem (Wed, 05 Nov 2025 15:52:37 UTC)

a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Dennis Clarke (Sat, 01 Nov 2025 23:33:33 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Michael Gmelin (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 00:30:11 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Dennis Clarke (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 00:59:55 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: cyric_at_mm.st (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 01:22:22 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Dennis Clarke (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 01:48:56 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Warner Losh (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 04:44:54 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Konstantin Belousov (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 05:39:26 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Thomas Schweikle (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 09:35:13 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Simon J. Gerraty (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 03:54:52 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Philipp Ost (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 15:59:02 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: cyric_at_mm.st (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 16:03:31 UTC)

Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ?: Ian Freislich (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 01:32:23 UTC)

rescue_-_usr.bin/id/id.c:149:16:_error :_use_of_undeclared_identifier_'Aflag': Sulev-Madis Silber (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 06:32:59 UTC)

Re: rescue - usr.bin/id/id.c:149:16: error: use of undeclared identifier 'Aflag': David Wolfskill (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 12:29:48 UTC)

Re:_rescue_-_usr.bin/id/id.c:149:16:_err or:_use_of_undeclared_identifier_'Aflag': Sulev-Madis Silber (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 13:18:18 UTC)

Re: RFC: How ZFS handles arc memory use: Alexander Leidinger (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 10:48:06 UTC)
ld: error: undefined symbol: yp_get_default_domain: Dennis Clarke (Sun, 02 Nov 2025 18:22:10 UTC)
FreeBSD Git Weekly 2025-10-27 to 2025-11-02: Graham Percival (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 03:30:37 UTC)
Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Thomas Schweikle (Mon, 03 Nov 2025 22:43:51 UTC)

Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav (Tue, 04 Nov 2025 12:39:04 UTC)
Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Marek Zarychta (Tue, 04 Nov 2025 13:42:22 UTC)

Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Sulev-Madis Silber (Tue, 04 Nov 2025 14:59:41 UTC)

Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Thomas Schweikle (Sat, 08 Nov 2025 18:21:22 UTC)

Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Michael Gmelin (Sat, 08 Nov 2025 18:51:37 UTC)
Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Sulev-Madis Silber (Sat, 08 Nov 2025 18:59:49 UTC)

Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Thomas Schweikle (Sat, 08 Nov 2025 20:36:43 UTC)

Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Sulev-Madis Silber (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 01:49:23 UTC)

Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Thomas Schweikle (Sun, 16 Nov 2025 09:29:00 UTC)

Re: "etcupdate extract" -- Failed to build new tree.: Miroslav Lachman (Tue, 04 Nov 2025 02:44:38 UTC)
Re: db> reset -> panic: lock (sleep mutex) eventhandler not locked @ /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_eventhandler.c:272: Mitchell Horne (Tue, 04 Nov 2025 15:41:06 UTC)
[LDWG] additional requiremetns to be able to install KDE DESKTOP on FBSD15 from install media.: Lars Tunkrans (Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:21:15 UTC)

Re: [LDWG] additional requirements to be able to install KDE DESKTOP on FBSD15 from install media.: Graham Perrin (Tue, 04 Nov 2025 19:59:17 UTC)

Re: [LDWG] additional requirements to be able to install KDE DESKTOP on FBSD15 from install media.: S. Ross Gohlke (Wed, 05 Nov 2025 16:15:04 UTC)

make buildworld: "[...] fatal error: 'llvm/Demangle/Demangle.h' file not found", among other errors: ruby R53 (Wed, 05 Nov 2025 17:50:43 UTC)

Re: make buildworld: "[...] fatal error: 'llvm/Demangle/Demangle.h' file not found", among other errors: David Wolfskill (Wed, 05 Nov 2025 18:00:34 UTC)

RE: make buildworld: "[...] fatal error: 'llvm/Demangle/Demangle.h' file not found", among other errors: Mark Millard (Wed, 05 Nov 2025 20:37:42 UTC)
Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: bob prohaska (Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:04:52 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Ronald Klop (Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:45:01 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: bob prohaska (Thu, 06 Nov 2025 16:38:28 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Mark Millard (Thu, 06 Nov 2025 18:00:19 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: bob prohaska (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 02:22:37 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Mark Millard (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 04:15:49 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: bob prohaska (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 16:16:47 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Mark Millard (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 17:02:43 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Paul Mather (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 15:42:24 UTC)

mongodb - Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Ronald Klop (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 15:55:59 UTC)

Re: mongodb - Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Paul Mather (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 16:26:07 UTC)

Re: mongodb - Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: John Kennedy (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 17:06:45 UTC)
Re: mongodb - Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Mark Millard (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 18:14:20 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Mark Millard (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 16:41:13 UTC)

Re:_Arm_v7_RPi2_-current_unresponsive _to_debugger_escape_during_buildworld: Sulev-Madis Silber (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 18:44:28 UTC)

Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: bob prohaska (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 16:49:05 UTC)

Re: Mistakenly started two buildworld instances...: Enji Cooper (yaneurabeya) (Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:25:26 UTC)
Re: Arm v7 RPi2 -current unresponsive to debugger escape during buildworld: Ronald Klop (Fri, 07 Nov 2025 17:19:02 UTC)
FYI: getopt in /usr/src/contrib/diff/lib/getopt.h vs. /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/include/unistd.h : reported as incompatible with future C23 use: Mark Millard (Sat, 08 Nov 2025 16:09:54 UTC)

Re: FYI: getopt in /usr/src/contrib/diff/lib/getopt.h vs. /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/include/unistd.h : reported as incompatible with future C23 use: Ed Maste (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 13:27:21 UTC)

Re: FYI: getopt in /usr/src/contrib/diff/lib/getopt.h vs. /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/include/unistd.h : reported as incompatible with future C23 use: Ed Maste (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 17:45:40 UTC)

RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Rick Macklem (Sat, 08 Nov 2025 23:22:37 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Konstantin Belousov (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 00:42:35 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Rick Macklem (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 02:09:15 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Konstantin Belousov (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 03:40:25 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Rick Macklem (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 04:06:06 UTC)

Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f: Steve Kargl (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 01:55:40 UTC)
RE: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]: Mark Millard (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 04:26:19 UTC)

Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]: Steve Kargl (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 07:00:20 UTC)

Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]: Bjoern A. Zeeb (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 16:56:28 UTC)

Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]: Steve Kargl (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 18:12:45 UTC)

Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]: Bjoern A. Zeeb (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 19:46:44 UTC)

Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]: Tomoaki AOKI (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 22:36:24 UTC)

Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]: Ed Maste (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 20:12:13 UTC)

Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]: Steve Kargl (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 21:17:59 UTC)

Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]: Bjoern A. Zeeb (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 22:16:09 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Ronald Klop (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 07:14:01 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Rick Macklem (Sun, 09 Nov 2025 08:52:38 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Don Lewis (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:15:44 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Rick Macklem (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 09:02:54 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Konstantin Belousov (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 13:50:15 UTC)
Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Mark Johnston (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:33:52 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Konstantin Belousov (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:03:26 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Bakul Shah (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:58:17 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Rick Macklem (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 09:09:36 UTC)
Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Rick Macklem (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 10:10:05 UTC)
Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Peter 'PMc' Much (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:50:27 UTC)

Re: RFC: Should copy_file_range(2) return after a few seconds?: Rick Macklem (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 22:09:50 UTC)

Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [ finding drm-* pkg fallout logs ]: Mark Millard (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 03:10:41 UTC)
HEADS UP (16.0 pkgbase): new package for PAM: Lexi Winter (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 10:49:49 UTC)
FreeBSD Git Weekly 2025-11-03 to 2025-11-09: Graham Percival (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:22:29 UTC)
kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: void (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 23:29:10 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: void (Mon, 10 Nov 2025 23:33:24 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: Mark Millard (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:27:05 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: bob prohaska (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 01:40:49 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: void (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 12:45:35 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: Ronald Klop (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 12:55:20 UTC)
Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: bob prohaska (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:30:54 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:34:43 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: bob prohaska (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:46:47 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:58:45 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: Mark Millard (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 18:24:47 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: bob prohaska (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 19:03:31 UTC)

Re: kernel: warning: total configured swap (493567 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount: Mark Millard (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:22:45 UTC)

main [so: 16] armv7 chroot and lib32 use: example fio command works on real armv7 system boots but fails on aarch64 chroot or lib32 use: Mark Millard (Tue, 11 Nov 2025 22:09:23 UTC)
keyboard in wrong mode after VT switch from X: Andriy Gapon (Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:14:50 UTC)

Re: keyboard in wrong mode after VT switch from X: Ed Maste (Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:38:08 UTC)

Re: keyboard in wrong mode after VT switch from X: Andriy Gapon (Wed, 12 Nov 2025 21:20:40 UTC)

Re: keyboard in wrong mode after VT switch from X: Bjoern A. Zeeb (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 23:32:14 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:25:02 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Ronald Klop (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:11:51 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Warner Losh (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:17:52 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Carl Shapiro (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:07:41 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Ronald Klop (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:52:10 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Michal Meloun (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:38:08 UTC)

openjdk11 compile fail on armv7 - (Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Ronald Klop (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 12:50:54 UTC)

Re: openjdk11 compile fail on armv7 - (Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Mark Millard (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:15:52 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Mark Millard (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:28:21 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 14:41:49 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Carl Shapiro (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:16:56 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 15:25:27 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Mark Millard (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:16:57 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 19:25:54 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Mark Millard (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 20:14:57 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Carl Shapiro (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:04:10 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 15:38:09 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Adrian Chadd (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 03:53:15 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Mark Millard (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 05:08:29 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [gdb backtrace!]: Mark Millard (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 18:18:04 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [gdb backtrace! End of area has 0x5a5a5a5a sequence]: Mark Millard (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 18:39:06 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [gdb backtrace! End of area has 0x5a5a5a5a sequence]: Mark Millard (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 21:44:59 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [Notes from another example core dump: #1]: Mark Millard (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:29:08 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [Notes from another example core dump: #1]: Mark Millard (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 01:05:51 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [Notes from another example core dump: #1]: Mark Millard (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 01:14:46 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [Notes from another example core dump: #2]: Mark Millard (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 01:24:12 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [Notes from another example core dump: #3]: Mark Millard (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 01:57:21 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [Notes from another example core dump: #4] [New common range #0..#10 __je_pa_alloc]: Mark Millard (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 03:03:16 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [Notes from another example core dump: #5] [Common range #0..#10 __je_pa_alloc]: Mark Millard (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 06:10:19 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [Notes from another example core dump: #5] [Common range #0..#10 __je_pa_alloc]: Mark Millard (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 17:53:13 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [Notes from another example core dump: #5] [Common range #0..#10 __je_pa_alloc]: Mark Millard (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 21:04:25 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 03:44:55 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Herbert J. Skuhra (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:31:26 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Fri, 14 Nov 2025 15:45:45 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Herbert J. Skuhra (Sat, 15 Nov 2025 10:04:08 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Sat, 15 Nov 2025 21:34:52 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Warner Losh (Sat, 15 Nov 2025 23:08:50 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Sun, 16 Nov 2025 15:43:54 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Warner Losh (Sun, 16 Nov 2025 17:51:01 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Michal Meloun (Sun, 16 Nov 2025 21:11:15 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Konstantin Belousov (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 02:03:50 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Mark Millard (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 03:04:12 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Mark Millard (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:24:16 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Mark Millard (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 09:15:13 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 03:34:28 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: Mark Millard (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 04:16:55 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld: bob prohaska (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:55:40 UTC)
Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld [kib committed git: 72a447d0bc76 that should help]: Mark Millard (Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:34:04 UTC)

native armv7 for struct aiocb offsets and overall size vs. aarch64 for struct aiocb32 offsets and overall size: most fields do not match: Mark Millard (Thu, 13 Nov 2025 22:01:37 UTC)
15.0's and main's [so: 16's] jemalloc man page reports "This manual describes jemalloc 5.2.1-0-gea6b3. . ." but 5.3.0-0-g54eae is in use instead for 15.0+ and main 16.: Mark Millard (Sun, 16 Nov 2025 21:34:20 UTC)

Re: 15.0's and main's [so: 16's] jemalloc man page reports "This manual describes jemalloc 5.2.1-0-gea6b3. . ." but 5.3.0-0-g54eae is in use instead for 15.0+ and main 16.: Minsoo Choo (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:51:37 UTC)

WITHOUT_CLEAN confusion in -current: void (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 01:14:17 UTC)

Re: WITHOUT_CLEAN confusion in -current: Herbert J. Skuhra (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 05:57:18 UTC)
Re: WITHOUT_CLEAN confusion in -current: Warner Losh (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 06:29:07 UTC)

Re: WITHOUT_CLEAN confusion in -current: void (Mon, 17 Nov 2025 09:31:54 UTC)

FreeBSD Git Weekly 2025-11-10 to 2025-11-16: Graham Percival (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 01:09:21 UTC)
Fwd: git: 396b32e801d6 - main - stand: Add back missing EFIAPI define: Warner Losh (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:51:37 UTC)
15.0-ish urgent: Please test iichid/keyboard patch on laptops: Poul-Henning Kamp (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 13:44:55 UTC)

Re: 15.0-ish urgent: Please test iichid/keyboard patch on laptops: Alan Somers (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 14:04:09 UTC)

Re: 15.0-ish urgent: Please test iichid/keyboard patch on laptops: Poul-Henning Kamp (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 14:26:08 UTC)

HP ProBook 6550b hangs on kernels above 14.0-RELEASE: Michael (Tue, 18 Nov 2025 19:20:13 UTC)

Re: HP ProBook 6550b hangs on kernels above 14.0-RELEASE: Adrian Chadd (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 15:30:08 UTC)

changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:17:23 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Minsoo Choo (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:42:22 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:02:47 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Minsoo Choo (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:14:28 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:54:38 UTC)
Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:14:27 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Michael Gmelin (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:25:20 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Freddie Cash (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:31:13 UTC)
Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 19:00:41 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:49:16 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 14:32:33 UTC)
Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Matthew Seaman (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 14:56:46 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: h v (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:51:33 UTC)
Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase - small addition in step 4): h v (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:27:30 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase - small addition in step 4): void (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:58:45 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 19:28:34 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Lexi Winter (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 00:39:25 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 01:29:27 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Lexi Winter (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 01:35:41 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Tomoaki AOKI (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:09:31 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Lexi Winter (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 11:39:56 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 12:28:05 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Lexi Winter (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 12:50:20 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Tomoaki AOKI (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 12:56:46 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Lexi Winter (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 13:06:28 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Tomoaki AOKI (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 17:33:46 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Marek Zarychta (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 12:50:20 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Lexi Winter (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 13:01:25 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: polyduekes_at_proton.me (Sun, 23 Nov 2025 08:07:35 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav (Sun, 23 Nov 2025 17:12:08 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: void (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 10:57:59 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Ronald Klop (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:36:52 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Sulev-Madis Silber (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 17:08:58 UTC)

nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': Ian FREISLICH (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 19:18:44 UTC)

Re: nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': Minsoo Choo (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 19:24:17 UTC)

Re: nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': Ian FREISLICH (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 19:50:41 UTC)

Re: nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': Minsoo Choo (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 20:42:41 UTC)

Re: nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': Ian FREISLICH (Wed, 19 Nov 2025 22:24:16 UTC)

Re: nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': Minsoo Choo (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 02:04:21 UTC)

Re: nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': Ian Freislich (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 02:12:46 UTC)

Re: nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': cyric_at_mm.st (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 04:51:39 UTC)

Re: nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': Minsoo Choo (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 05:08:24 UTC)

Re: nvme.c:2012:2: error: call to undeclared function 'memmove': Minsoo Choo (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:15:16 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Mark Millard (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:44:37 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:31:33 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase: Mark Millard (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 14:55:44 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase - small addition in step 4): vermaden (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:17:06 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase - small addition in step 4): void (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:33:20 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" [ *** i386 chroot on amd64 can get the failure on main 16 too *** ]: Mark Millard (Thu, 20 Nov 2025 23:38:16 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" [ *** i386 chroot on amd64 can get the failure on main 16 too *** ]: Mark Millard (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:03:17 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" [ *** i386 chroot on amd64 can get the failure on main 16 too *** ]: Mark Millard (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 16:30:54 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" [ *** i386 chroot on amd64 can get the failure on main 16 too *** ] [failed without new kernel check detection]: Mark Millard (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:29:36 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" [ *** i386 chroot on amd64 can get the failure on main 16 too *** ] [failed without new kernel check detection]: Mark Millard (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:34:21 UTC)

Re: Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" [ junk:true vs. junk:alloc,zero:true ]: Mark Millard (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 15:01:39 UTC)

mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Michal Meloun (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 07:12:55 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 08:36:36 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:03:44 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Michal Meloun (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:08:47 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:54:18 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 20:02:57 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Michal Meloun (Fri, 21 Nov 2025 20:52:29 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase [ evidence gathering for problems when using a pkgbase system ]: Mark Millard (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 02:35:48 UTC)
Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 13:48:08 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 14:05:48 UTC)

jemalloc/kernel debug context: panic: vm_object_coalesce: obj Oxfffff800090a27c0 next_pindex Oxf next_size 0x4 obj_size 0x19: Mark Millard (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 16:29:05 UTC)
Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Michal Meloun (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 16:37:19 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 16:53:15 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Mark Millard (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 17:37:15 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 18:22:39 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 18:45:32 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Michal Meloun (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 19:54:21 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 20:19:33 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 20:41:27 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Michal Meloun (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 22:07:41 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld): Konstantin Belousov (Sun, 23 Nov 2025 09:57:11 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld) [i386 chroot still fails with vm_map.c and vm_object.c patches]: Mark Millard (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 20:20:28 UTC)
Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld) [debug.vm_check_pg_zero=1 silent]: Mark Millard (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 20:48:32 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld) [*** latest update working in i386 chroot test ***]: Mark Millard (Sat, 22 Nov 2025 21:55:47 UTC)

Re: mmap( MAP_ANON) is broken on current. (was Still seeing Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0" on armv7 buildworld) [*** latest test patch update working in i386 and armv7 chroot tests ***]: Mark Millard (Sun, 23 Nov 2025 02:44:36 UTC)

looking for testers for if_rge - RTL8125/8126/8127 ethernet driver: Adrian Chadd (Sun, 23 Nov 2025 02:16:28 UTC)

Re: looking for testers for if_rge - RTL8125/8126/8127 ethernet driver: James Snow (Sun, 23 Nov 2025 20:56:27 UTC)
Re: looking for testers for if_rge - RTL8125/8126/8127 ethernet driver: Florian Smeets (Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:13:23 UTC)

Re: looking for testers for if_rge - RTL8125/8126/8127 ethernet driver: Adrian Chadd (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 16:51:32 UTC)

Re: looking for testers for if_rge - RTL8125/8126/8127 ethernet driver: Bernard Spil (Sun, 30 Nov 2025 13:51:29 UTC)

Re: looking for testers for if_rge - RTL8125/8126/8127 ethernet driver: Bernard Spil (Sun, 30 Nov 2025 18:48:38 UTC)

Re: looking for testers for if_rge - RTL8125/8126/8127 ethernet driver: Mark Johnston (Sun, 30 Nov 2025 16:20:08 UTC)

Re: looking for testers for if_rge - RTL8125/8126/8127 ethernet driver: Spil Oss (Sun, 30 Nov 2025 18:41:25 UTC)

freezing on unmountin ext2fs USB device: A FreeBSD User (Sun, 23 Nov 2025 14:14:12 UTC)

Re: freezing on unmountin ext2fs USB device: Warner Losh (Wed, 26 Nov 2025 04:03:01 UTC)

Re: freezing on unmountin ext2fs USB device: FreeBSD User (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 05:22:16 UTC)

Re: freezing on unmountin ext2fs USB device: Warner Losh (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 06:33:50 UTC)

Re: freezing on unmountin ext2fs USB device: FreeBSD User (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 08:59:04 UTC)

Re: freezing on unmountin ext2fs USB device: Juraj Lutter (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 10:29:46 UTC)

Re: freezing on unmountin ext2fs USB device: Warner Losh (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 10:32:52 UTC)

Re: freezing on unmountin ext2fs USB device: Warner Losh (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 10:32:09 UTC)

Re: freezing on unmountin ext2fs USB device: A FreeBSD User (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 18:37:21 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase [ /var/cache/pkg/FreeBSD-*.pkg as well? ]: Mark Millard (Sun, 23 Nov 2025 23:59:20 UTC)

Re: changing from pkgbase to regularbase [ /var/cache/pkg/FreeBSD-*.pkg as well? ]: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav (Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:38:39 UTC)

November 2025 stabilization week: Gleb Smirnoff (Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:00:26 UTC)

Re: November 2025 stabilization week: Olivier_Cochard-Labbé (Tue, 25 Nov 2025 23:31:15 UTC)

Re: November 2025 stabilization week: Olivier_Cochard-Labbé (Wed, 26 Nov 2025 07:31:17 UTC)

Re: November 2025 stabilization week: Olivier_Cochard-Labbé (Wed, 26 Nov 2025 23:00:37 UTC)

Some issues in the 20251124 16-CURRENT snapshot: Tom Jones (Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:00:38 UTC)

287569_–_bsdinstall:_restarting_installation: _Error:_No_disk(s)_present_to_configure_(was:_Some_issu es_in_the_20251124_16-CURRENT_snapshot): Graham Perrin (Mon, 24 Nov 2025 21:11:11 UTC)

FreeBSD Git Weekly 2025-11-17 to 2025-11-23: Graham Percival (Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:14:15 UTC)
bsdconfig fails to work: Chris Petrik (Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:22:03 UTC)

Re: bsdconfig fails to work: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav (Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:05:15 UTC)

building libclang and WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN?: Ronald Klop (Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:52:06 UTC)

Re: building libclang and WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN?: Warner Losh (Tue, 25 Nov 2025 14:27:47 UTC)

Re: building libclang and WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN?: Ronald Klop (Tue, 25 Nov 2025 15:12:10 UTC)

Request for testing [was: Heads-up: Kernel module symbol resolution changing]: Ed Maste (Tue, 25 Nov 2025 22:58:59 UTC)

Re: Request for testing [was: Heads-up: Kernel module symbol resolution changing]: Ed Maste (Thu, 27 Nov 2025 17:28:30 UTC)

FreeBSD/X11: Howto revive DisplayPort?: FreeBSD User (Wed, 26 Nov 2025 15:37:21 UTC)

Re: FreeBSD/X11: Howto revive DisplayPort?: Lars Tunkrans (Wed, 26 Nov 2025 21:31:20 UTC)

Re: FreeBSD/X11: Howto revive DisplayPort?: FreeBSD User (Thu, 27 Nov 2025 05:31:34 UTC)

Re: FreeBSD/X11: Howto revive DisplayPort?: Cy Schubert (Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:47:47 UTC)

Re: FreeBSD/X11: Howto revive DisplayPort?: FreeBSD User (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 06:08:56 UTC)

Re: FreeBSD/X11: Howto revive DisplayPort?: Marek Zarychta (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 06:37:20 UTC)

Re: FreeBSD/X11: Howto revive DisplayPort?: Paul Floyd (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 07:35:54 UTC)

Re: FreeBSD/X11: Howto revive DisplayPort?: Adrian Chadd (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 16:57:17 UTC)

operation not supported Wayland: Леонид Гнездилов (Wed, 26 Nov 2025 16:11:40 UTC)

Re: operation not supported Wayland: Gleb Popov (Wed, 26 Nov 2025 16:31:00 UTC)
Re: operation not supported Wayland: S. Ross Gohlke (Thu, 27 Nov 2025 16:44:23 UTC)

Re: HP ProBook 6550b hangs on kernels above 14.0-RELEASE: Michael (Wed, 26 Nov 2025 22:03:56 UTC)
Re: operation not supported Wayland: Gleb Popov (Thu, 27 Nov 2025 11:53:00 UTC)
15-STABLE: dhclient fails on em0 (Lenovo T580): FreeBSD User (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 07:26:30 UTC)

Re: 15-STABLE: dhclient fails on em0 (Lenovo T580): Ronald Klop (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 09:16:15 UTC)

Re: 15-STABLE: dhclient fails on em0 (Lenovo T580): FreeBSD User (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 09:50:16 UTC)

Re: 15-STABLE: dhclient fails on em0 (Lenovo T580): Ronald Klop (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 09:56:08 UTC)

Re: 15-STABLE: dhclient fails on em0 (Lenovo T580): FreeBSD User (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 11:24:18 UTC)

Re: 15-STABLE: dhclient fails on em0 (Lenovo T580): FreeBSD User (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:05:34 UTC)

Re: 15-STABLE: dhclient fails on em0 (Lenovo T580): Dag-Erling_Smørgrav (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:34:37 UTC)

pkg-static: dir '/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg' is missing: FreeBSD User (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:22:23 UTC)

Re: pkg-static: dir '/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg' is missing: Herbert J. Skuhra (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 11:36:46 UTC)

Re: pkg-static: dir '/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg' is missing: FreeBSD User (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 14:38:55 UTC)

Re: pkg-static: dir '/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg' is missing: The Doctor (Fri, 28 Nov 2025 14:55:03 UTC)

CURRENT: working alternative nVidia GPU driver for x11/nvidia-kmod?: FreeBSD User (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 12:15:06 UTC)

Re: CURRENT: working alternative nVidia GPU driver for x11/nvidia-kmod?: Tomek CEDRO (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 12:18:12 UTC)

Re: CURRENT: working alternative nVidia GPU driver for x11/nvidia-kmod?: FreeBSD User (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 13:25:00 UTC)

Re: CURRENT: working alternative nVidia GPU driver for x11/nvidia-kmod?: Tomoaki AOKI (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 16:45:30 UTC)
Re: CURRENT: working alternative nVidia GPU driver for x11/nvidia-kmod?: Tomek CEDRO (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 16:47:10 UTC)

Re: CURRENT: working alternative nVidia GPU driver for x11/nvidia-kmod?: Adrian Chadd (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 17:27:20 UTC)

Re: CURRENT: working alternative nVidia GPU driver for x11/nvidia-kmod?: Lars Tunkrans (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 17:49:40 UTC)

Re: CURRENT: working alternative nVidia GPU driver for x11/nvidia-kmod?: Tomek CEDRO (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 17:52:01 UTC)

Re: CURRENT: working alternative nVidia GPU driver for x11/nvidia-kmod?: Tomoaki AOKI (Sat, 29 Nov 2025 18:11:52 UTC)

FreeBSD Status Report - Third Quarter 2025: Lorenzo Salvadore (Sun, 30 Nov 2025 12:57:22 UTC)

Go to: [ monthly archives ] [ by author ] [ by date ]