Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10]
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 22:36:24 UTC
On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 19:46:44 +0000 (UTC) "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Sun, 9 Nov 2025, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On 11/9/25 08:56, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> > >> So if you want things to work, it's the ports which needs to be fixed. > >> > > > > First, commit the patch from the PR. That fixes the problem. > > The -D is not for a drm-kmod/ports fix please; there's another semi-native driver > in src which uses LinuxKPI headers and needed this and there's still a need to > fix that. Then I'll see if I can get away with it within LinuxKPI itself. > > I added a suggested patch to your PR for the port for some grpahics/ports > person to start work with and get it in. > > > > Second, it is an interesting stance to to take. It's okay to > > break/diminish the FreeBSD experience for others in the name > > of progress. > > If that would be the case, then I probably wouldn't have bothered following up > and helping identifying a better fix the moment I became aware of the problem. > > I am sorry x11 hasn't dealt with this since (must be) end of September. > > /bz > > > -- > Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7 What's interesting here looking into freebsd-pkg-fallout ML is that (putting aside builder start failures) graphics/drm-515-kmod alone is failing. Yes, graphics/nvidia-drm-515-kmod[-devel] doesn't. As graphics/nvidia-drm-*-kmod[-devel] ports uses only some parts of distfile for corresponding graphics/drm-*-kmod ports, possibly it could help narrowing down where is the problem in. (Would be hard, though.) Note that I've checked posts on November and October using ML archive. Regards. -- Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>