svn - but smaller?
Isaac (.ike) Levy
ike at blackskyresearch.net
Mon Mar 11 12:53:44 UTC 2013
On Mar 11, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:33:50 -0400, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
>> On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:36 PM, John Mehr wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>> I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
>>> as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s
>>> DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh
>>> base/releng/8.3 tree using svnup (Subversion's svn takes approximately
>>> 12 minutes). Incremental updates, such as tracking one of the stable
>>> branches takes only 2-3 minutes.
>>> For anyone that wants to preview the port before it gets added to the
>>> ports tree (assuming I got the send-pr correct), the tarball is located
>>> Please let me know if you find any issues.
>> If anyone has any info about sunup(1) making it's way into base, please tell me so I can kill this page:
>> (After trying to catch up on the relevant lists, I just updated that 'status page' on the FreeBSD wiki.)
>> John, this is spectacular- thank you!
> The link to svnup above is stale however, now at 0.56. Best use the
> link (as on your wiki page) of http://jcm.dsl.visi.com/freebsd/svnup/
> and go from there.
> Also, I wouldn't be in a hurry to kill that wiki page, lots of useful
> info still there, even when it becomes only for historical reference.
> cheers, Ian
Thanks Ian, makes sense. I already had the base URL in there- but you're right that the thread URL to this post yields a confusing download (that tarball no longer exists).
To avoid confusion, yet leave breadcrumbs to get back to this thread, I changed the link thread to refer to John Mehr's original post to list.
More information about the freebsd-stable