svn - but smaller?
demelier.david at gmail.com
Mon Mar 11 08:38:58 UTC 2013
Yes that would be great to have svnup into base as we had with cvsup then I
will be able to fetch ports/base without doing any other steps before :)
2013/3/11 Isaac (.ike) Levy <ike at blackskyresearch.net>
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:36 PM, John Mehr wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
> > as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s
> > DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh
> > base/releng/8.3 tree using svnup (Subversion's svn takes approximately
> > 12 minutes). Incremental updates, such as tracking one of the stable
> > branches takes only 2-3 minutes.
> > For anyone that wants to preview the port before it gets added to the
> > ports tree (assuming I got the send-pr correct), the tarball is located
> > at:
> > http://jcm.dsl.visi.com/freebsd/svnup/svnup-0.5.tar.xz
> > Please let me know if you find any issues.
> If anyone has any info about sunup(1) making it's way into base, please
> tell me so I can kill this page:
> (After trying to catch up on the relevant lists, I just updated that
> 'status page' on the FreeBSD wiki.)
> John, this is spectacular- thank you!
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-stable