4.8-Release disk3 and disk4
Peter Jeremy
peter.jeremy at alcatel.com.au
Tue Apr 8 13:40:41 PDT 2003
On 2003-Apr-08 15:33:44 -0400, Bill Vermillion <bv at wjv.com> wrote:
>> The simple explanation is that this is all the FreeBSD project itself
>> creates. The ports packages that filled up CD's 2, 3 and 4 are no
>> longer part of the "official" FreeBSD -RELEASE image.
>
>And how much of that will relate to the fact that it now runs
>on iNTEL, Alpha, and PC98 architectures. I remember when I had
>NeXTStep we had quad-fat disks to support all architectures.
>I can see this could cause ports problems as some have binary
>pieces in them.
Apart from FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE (which had an Alpha install on disk 2),
the different architectures have different -RELEASE ISOs. This
avoids the problem of trying to build CDs that have binaries for
different architectures.
Obviously supporting all the different architectures increases the
-RELEASE effort and provides more incentive to only have one space
constrained ISO instead of 4. (There's no real space constraint on
the live filesystem disk).
Peter
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list