Status of SPARC64 port?
Scheidell at secnap.com
Scheidell at secnap.com
Tue Apr 8 12:57:08 PDT 2003
thanks all.
again, sometimes its hard to know if the web docs are out of date, and hoping that someone in a wide audience would have tried it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jake Burkholder [mailto:jake at locore.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 3:56 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Status of SPARC64 port?
>
>
> Apparently, On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:28:15AM -0400,
> Michael Scheidell said words to the effect of;
>
> > I was looking at the Sparc 64 4.7 or 4.8 port, wondering if
> its in any state
> > to put on my Solaris v100.
> > Just need the basics, eide, network, kbm,mouse, graphics (x).
> >
> > A bonus would be support for the lom (light out management)
> features and the
> > flash card.
> >
> > Reason for change is I HOPE that the math (ssl) performance
> is better on
> > FBSD, as well as I am just tired of keeping track of
> >
> /opt/bin,/usr/opt/bin,/usr/bin//spare/user/opt/bin/,/opt/sfw
> and the mired
> > of other paths.
> >
> > It looks like mixed message there, with one page saying it
> supports the
> > v100, another saying it does yet.
> >
> > And if nor FBSD, then which one? OpenBSD, NetBSD?
> > Anyone have any performance tests?
>
> 5.0-RELEASE should install on that machine, but if you want
> to use it for
> more than a headless box we're probably not ready for you
> yet. The console
> support is still rudimentary at best, you want to be using a
> serial console
> if at all possible.
>
> And yes, as Julian pointed (hi Julian), its best to ask on
> the sparc64 list.
>
> Jake
>
>
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list