freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org
Packaging the FreeBSD base system
September 2025 Archives by thread
- Re: pkg upgrade, vfs.zfs.arc.free_target, vfs.zfs.arc.sys_free, vm.pageout_oom_seq: Mark Millard (Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:03:53 UTC)
- Re: I just made a typo in a glob pattern for a pkg delete -g (no -a and no force) and mistakenly then selected Y, leading to partial partial system destruction before I stopped it: Graham Perrin (Mon, 01 Sep 2025 01:34:00 UTC)
- Re: I just made a typo in a glob pattern for a pkg delete -g (no -a and no force) and mistakenly then selected Y, leading to partial partial system destruction before I stopped it: Mark Millard (Mon, 01 Sep 2025 02:57:35 UTC)
- pkg autoremove removes base package dependencies: Quentin_Thébault (Mon, 01 Sep 2025 05:23:38 UTC)
- pkgbase: FreeBSD Handbook: corrections and other changes: Graham Perrin (Tue, 02 Sep 2025 03:55:46 UTC)
- [Bug 289097] Base upgrades must not lose user customisations in dot files such as /root/.cshrc and /root/.profile: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:32:02 UTC)
- Re: pkg upgrade, vfs.zfs.arc.free_target, vfs.zfs.arc.sys_free, vm.pageout_oom_seq [Notes about error messages during and RAM+SWAP requirements, UFS context]: Mark Millard (Tue, 02 Sep 2025 18:19:41 UTC)
- Re: pkg upgrade, vfs.zfs.arc.free_target, vfs.zfs.arc.sys_free, vm.pageout_oom_seq [Notes about error messages during and RAM+SWAP requirements, UFS context]: Mark Millard (Tue, 02 Sep 2025 20:49:35 UTC)
- pkg upgrade, vm.pageout_oom_seq: swap off: UFS, ZFS: Graham Perrin (Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:14:24 UTC)
- Re: pkg upgrade, vm.pageout_oom_seq: swap off: UFS, ZFS: Mark Millard (Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:53:31 UTC)
- Re: pkg upgrade, vm.pageout_oom_seq: swap off: UFS, ZFS: Mark Millard (Thu, 04 Sep 2025 01:50:22 UTC)
- Re: pkg upgrade, vm.pageout_oom_seq: swap off: UFS, ZFS: Graham Perrin (Thu, 04 Sep 2025 07:17:05 UTC)
- Re: pkg upgrade, vm.pageout_oom_seq: swap off: UFS, ZFS: Graham Perrin (Thu, 04 Sep 2025 13:29:54 UTC)
- Re: pkg upgrade, vm.pageout_oom_seq: swap off: UFS, ZFS: Graham Perrin (Thu, 04 Sep 2025 14:18:21 UTC)
- STOP: Francisco De Luca (Wed, 03 Sep 2025 10:08:33 UTC)
- Re: after updating to latest, pkg base segfaults and leaves me unbootable: Graham Perrin (Sat, 06 Sep 2025 21:17:57 UTC)
- pkgbase FreeBSD:15:* are currently as of 2025-Sep-03/04 (mostly) as far as the most recent file date and time goes, none are yet more recent: Mark Millard (Sun, 07 Sep 2025 00:17:19 UTC)
- pkg upgrade, ZFS, swap on, vm.pageout_oom_seq: Graham Perrin (Sun, 07 Sep 2025 02:10:02 UTC)
- [Bug 281889] add pkgbase meta-packages for easier usage: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 07 Sep 2025 16:36:12 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 08 Sep 2025 08:49:03 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 08 Sep 2025 12:04:47 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 08 Sep 2025 12:30:34 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 08 Sep 2025 12:43:49 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:04:22 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:36:18 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:52:00 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 08 Sep 2025 23:45:30 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:26:46 UTC)
- 15* jails to build base packages (was: FreeBSD 15.0-ALPHA1 Now Available): Graham Perrin (Tue, 09 Sep 2025 01:40:43 UTC)
- Re: 15* jails to build base packages: Mark Millard (Tue, 09 Sep 2025 16:59:37 UTC)
- https://pkg.freebsd.org link for FreeBSD:16:aarch64 is still getting: "404 Not Found" after the others updated: Mark Millard (Wed, 10 Sep 2025 01:10:06 UTC)
- pkg 2.3.0 has been committed; should lead to less time consming poudriere bulk port-package build runs: Mark Millard (Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:51:44 UTC)
- [Bug 289097] Base upgrades must not lose user customisations in dot files such as /root/.cshrc and /root/.profile: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Wed, 10 Sep 2025 20:41:51 UTC)
- poudriere-devel unable to update main [so: 16] jail world absent materials for FreeBSD-ports and FreeBSD-ports-kmods: Mark Millard (Fri, 12 Sep 2025 03:42:52 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:11:21 UTC)
- man -k and man -f not working with pkgbase 15-stable installation: polyduekes_at_proton.me (Fri, 12 Sep 2025 18:04:34 UTC)
- pkgbase update procedure, using, for example, clibs as an example to illustrate the more general question: Mark Millard (Sat, 13 Sep 2025 00:19:27 UTC)
- RE: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/: Mark Millard (Sat, 13 Sep 2025 03:45:37 UTC)
- I've got a pkg 2.3.1 "pkg-static autoremove" that has grown to have over 1 GiByte of RAM resident after more than 77 minutes of cpu time: Mark Millard (Sun, 14 Sep 2025 16:38:52 UTC)
- 14.3p2 packages follow a major upgrade to 15.0-ALPHA2: Graham Perrin (Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:47:24 UTC)
- Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default?: vermaden (Tue, 16 Sep 2025 22:16:06 UTC)
- Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default?: vermaden (Tue, 16 Sep 2025 22:26:43 UTC)
- Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default?: vermaden (Tue, 16 Sep 2025 23:11:03 UTC)
- FYI: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ has been updated with 15.0-ALPHA2 *.pkg files: Mark Millard (Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:41:31 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:07:47 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:35:47 UTC)
- bsdconfig lost through a major upgrade: Graham Perrin (Wed, 17 Sep 2025 21:56:36 UTC)
- An idea for some future point : provide for FreeBSD-kernel-generic-debug installs to help debug 15.?-RELEASE problems without software builds: Mark Millard (Thu, 18 Sep 2025 03:44:03 UTC)
- An odd vital FreeBSD-set-* result?: Mark Millard (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:48:11 UTC)
- [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:56:32 UTC)
- [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:58:00 UTC)
- [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 16:09:35 UTC)
- [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 16:40:16 UTC)
- [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 16:44:17 UTC)
- [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 16:45:11 UTC)
- Is the base set of packages everything, or not?: Graham Perrin (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:00:41 UTC)
- Correct /usr/local/etc/ssl/cert.pem results from pkgbase installations?: Mark Millard (Fri, 19 Sep 2025 20:07:05 UTC)
- [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sat, 20 Sep 2025 22:42:44 UTC)
- 15.0-ALPHA3 update did not update any FreeBSD-set-*.pkg files in https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ ?: Mark Millard (Sun, 21 Sep 2025 02:37:11 UTC)
- Why is https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/base_latest/ existing and getting 15.0-ALPHA* updates?: Mark Millard (Mon, 22 Sep 2025 01:39:25 UTC)
- [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 22 Sep 2025 17:16:51 UTC)
- https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ?: Mark Millard (Fri, 26 Sep 2025 04:37:52 UTC)
- Why are /usr/lib/pam*.so in FreeBSD-runtime instead of FreeBSD-runtime-dev ?: Mark Millard (Sat, 27 Sep 2025 22:19:01 UTC)
- Re: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ? [ALPHA4 update is even odder]: Mark Millard (Sat, 27 Sep 2025 23:24:35 UTC)
- FYI: The current status of what pkgbase podriere jail creations/updates end up installing that might not be intended: Mark Millard (Mon, 29 Sep 2025 00:25:50 UTC)
- [Bug 289097] Base upgrades must not lose user customisations in dot files such as /root/.cshrc and /root/.profile: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Tue, 30 Sep 2025 06:05:01 UTC)
- [Bug 289097] Base upgrades must not lose user customisations in dot files such as /root/.cshrc and /root/.profile: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:53:15 UTC)
- [Bug 289097] Base upgrades must not lose user customisations in dot files such as /root/.cshrc and /root/.profile: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:54:28 UTC)
- FYI: What pkgbase material is out of date relative to FreeBSD-SA-25:08.openssl and FreeBSD-EN-25:18.freebsd-update: Mark Millard (Tue, 30 Sep 2025 19:20:39 UTC)