capabilities impletementation?

[Dingo]

Robert , Scott ?? You guys want to give a bit of insight see if we can
co-ordinate this between me and Joey, I think we are willing to pitch in
more. I know Ive been pounding SeBSD into submission, where can we merge
and bring forth the efforts faster?? And yes.. Scott a diff drop point
would be good for me

On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 16:44 +0800, Joey Try wrote:
> Yes, I wish to join you.
> 
> I have studied the mail you forward to me, maybe Watson plan to merge CAP
> into MAC Framework. I also studied a little of MAC Framework in FreeBSD6.0, 
> and found that there are not any cap_check entries, although there is also 
> capability.h in sys/ directory! I do not know how Robert Watson plans for 
> this. 
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> >----Dingo----
> >Well per a previous conversation! Not sure how related it is to CAP but
> >as stated below pertaining to SeBSD as a whole. Im trying to pitch in to
> >bring the SeBSD to a more current 6.0 version. If you want to pitch in
> >someplace I think the help would be appreciated.
> >
> >----SNIP--------
> >> So now that 6.0 is cut and RELEASE are there any plans to run a SeBSD 
> >> snapshot ? Its would be nice to see something more current as even the
> >> previous snapshot was based on a dated early version of 6.). Any plans
> >> in the works, I see the base is current, but seBSD tree is still dated
> >
> >I'm in the process of updating the TrustedBSD base branch to a recent
> >7.x, and hope to finish that in the next few days.  I have plans to then
> >merge those changes towards the MAC branch, although that will take some
> >time to merge due to some conflicting changes between the base FreeBSD
> >tree and MAC branch.  Once those prerequisites are in place, it should
> >be possible to begin work on updating SEBSD to a post 6.0-RELEASE state.
> >One of the conflicts introduced in earlier work was that FreeBSD has
> >made further moves towards using nmount(), which generated conflicts
> >with the introduction of a labeled mount system call in the SEBSD
> >branch.  With the movement towards nmount(), a special system call for a
> >labeled mount is no longer required, as the label can simply become an
> >additional nmount() argument.  However, some further tweaking and
> >merging of that conversion is required.  In short: currently, no ETA,
> >but hopefully in the next month or so.
> >
> >More hands are certainly welcome :-).  The code in the SEBSD branch
> >right now needs to have its update to a slightly older 6.x finished as a
> >first step, which basically involves fixing up any continuing disruption
> >from the nmount change.
> >
> >Robert N M Watson
> >------SNIP-------------
> >
> >On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 15:57 +0800, Joey Try wrote:
> >> hi all, I am researching the POSIX.1e capabilities impletementation in TrustedBSD
> >> 
> >> I only get the trustedbsd-cap source derived from FreeBSD5.0, since FreeBSD has release its 6.0 version, I want to know whether there is any updated source?  whether there is anyone I can discuss with?
> >> 
> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at trustedbsd.org
> >> with "unsubscribe trustedbsd-discuss" in the body of the message
> >
> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at trustedbsd.org
> >with "unsubscribe trustedbsd-discuss" in the body of the message
> >
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at trustedbsd.org
> with "unsubscribe trustedbsd-discuss" in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at trustedbsd.org
with "unsubscribe trustedbsd-discuss" in the body of the message