svn commit: r183819 - in stable/7/sys: . compat/linprocfs fs/procfs

Roman Divacky rdivacky at
Mon Oct 13 14:22:48 UTC 2008

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des at> writes:
> > > Roman Divacky <rdivacky at> writes:
> > > > what about commiting this to note this change?
> > > > +   <para>A serious problem emulating /proc for Linux was fixed.  Many Linux
> > > > +      ports are now working including the linux-flashplugin9 port.</para>
> > > "A serious problem was fixed"?  Really?  And if none of that software
> > > worked before this commit, how come they were already in ports?
> > I do not think that mentioning of this should appear in release notes,
> > but Roman is mostly right in stating the fact.
> Pretend you don't really know the details of the change, and reread
> Roman's proposed relnotes entry.  Do you think it gives a correct
> impression of the nature and severity of the issue?

my intention was to advertise that flash9 works ok now. Which is 
a thing a lot of people care about. Feel free to submit your own

More information about the svn-src-stable-7 mailing list