svn commit: r183819 - in stable/7/sys: . compat/linprocfs
kostikbel at gmail.com
Mon Oct 13 14:44:39 UTC 2008
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des at des.no> writes:
> > > Roman Divacky <rdivacky at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > > what about commiting this to note this change?
> > > > + <para>A serious problem emulating /proc for Linux was fixed. Many Linux
> > > > + ports are now working including the linux-flashplugin9 port.</para>
> > > "A serious problem was fixed"? Really? And if none of that software
> > > worked before this commit, how come they were already in ports?
> > I do not think that mentioning of this should appear in release notes,
> > but Roman is mostly right in stating the fact.
> Pretend you don't really know the details of the change, and reread
> Roman's proposed relnotes entry. Do you think it gives a correct
> impression of the nature and severity of the issue?
Let me restate what I said above, in more explicit way:
1. The problem fixed actually caused new glibc to fail for threaded
linux processes. This is a serious problem for non-default linux-base
ports. It is not a serious problem for linprocfs code itself.
2. I oppose against making any promises of the quality of the linux
emulator, esp. in the release notes, esp. making a statement that
"flash9 works !".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-7/attachments/20081013/da5473c5/attachment.pgp
More information about the svn-src-stable-7