svn commit: r183819 - in stable/7/sys: . compat/linprocfs
des at des.no
Mon Oct 13 14:17:54 UTC 2008
Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> writes:
> > Roman Divacky <rdivacky at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > what about commiting this to note this change?
> > > + <para>A serious problem emulating /proc for Linux was fixed. Many Linux
> > > + ports are now working including the linux-flashplugin9 port.</para>
> > "A serious problem was fixed"? Really? And if none of that software
> > worked before this commit, how come they were already in ports?
> I do not think that mentioning of this should appear in release notes,
> but Roman is mostly right in stating the fact.
Pretend you don't really know the details of the change, and reread
Roman's proposed relnotes entry. Do you think it gives a correct
impression of the nature and severity of the issue?
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
More information about the svn-src-stable-7