ATI radeon 3450 with new xorg

[Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina]

On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 01:00:27 +0200
Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm at fbsd.es> wrote:

> Thanks for clarify it. Tomorrow I will file a bug providing more information to commit Dimitry's patch.
> 

I submitted the bug 192286.

Cheers,

> On 31 de julio de 2014 00:31:05 CEST, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman at gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim at freebsd.org>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On 30 Jul 2014, at 19:30, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm at fbsd.es>
> >wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:46:36 +0300
> >> > Arto Pekkanen <isoa at kapsi.fi> wrote:
> >> >> Is there a chance this patch would be MFC'd?
> >>
> >> I'm not sure how the branching works with ports, but this would
> >probably
> >> be a good candidate for merging to whatever the latest "stable"
> >branch
> >> is.
> >>
> >>
> >> > His patch fixes my problem, but I don't know if Dimitry is waiting
> >for
> >> more opinions favourable before commit it.
> >>
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> Thanks for testing, it is good to know that it works on real
> >hardware!
> >> I have only been able to test it on a virtualized environment
> >myself...
> >>
> >> In any case, I am not a ports committer, so the maintainer(s) should
> >> commit it, or give their approval for me to do so.
> >>
> >> -Dimitry
> >>
> >> Dimitry and Carlos,
> >
> >Ports don't branch. They are only tagged at the points of FreeBSD
> >releases,
> >so all commits are to head. As a result, the term MFC is not
> >appropriate.
> >The patch simply needs to be committed to the tree. Since this port is
> >maintained by x11@, this is the place to talk about it. But to get the
> >patch committed, someone should open a bug at
> >http://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla. Be sure to include the patch and
> >report
> >that it has been tested and buy whom..
> >--
> >R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
> >E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
> 
> -- 
> Enviado desde mi teléfono con K-9 Mail.

-- 
Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm at fbsd.es>