ATI radeon 3450 with new xorg

[Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina]

Thanks for clarify it. Tomorrow I will file a bug providing more information to commit Dimitry's patch.

On 31 de julio de 2014 00:31:05 CEST, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim at freebsd.org>
>wrote:
>
>> On 30 Jul 2014, at 19:30, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm at fbsd.es>
>wrote:
>> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:46:36 +0300
>> > Arto Pekkanen <isoa at kapsi.fi> wrote:
>> >> Is there a chance this patch would be MFC'd?
>>
>> I'm not sure how the branching works with ports, but this would
>probably
>> be a good candidate for merging to whatever the latest "stable"
>branch
>> is.
>>
>>
>> > His patch fixes my problem, but I don't know if Dimitry is waiting
>for
>> more opinions favourable before commit it.
>>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> Thanks for testing, it is good to know that it works on real
>hardware!
>> I have only been able to test it on a virtualized environment
>myself...
>>
>> In any case, I am not a ports committer, so the maintainer(s) should
>> commit it, or give their approval for me to do so.
>>
>> -Dimitry
>>
>> Dimitry and Carlos,
>
>Ports don't branch. They are only tagged at the points of FreeBSD
>releases,
>so all commits are to head. As a result, the term MFC is not
>appropriate.
>The patch simply needs to be committed to the tree. Since this port is
>maintained by x11@, this is the place to talk about it. But to get the
>patch committed, someone should open a bug at
>http://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla. Be sure to include the patch and
>report
>that it has been tested and buy whom..
>--
>R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
>E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com

-- 
Enviado desde mi teléfono con K-9 Mail.