ATI radeon 3450 with new xorg

Max Brazhnikov makc at freebsd.org
Thu Jul 31 08:20:06 UTC 2014


On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:31:05 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 30 Jul 2014, at 19:30, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm at fbsd.es> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:46:36 +0300
> > > Arto Pekkanen <isoa at kapsi.fi> wrote:
> > >> Is there a chance this patch would be MFC'd?
> >
> > I'm not sure how the branching works with ports, but this would probably
> > be a good candidate for merging to whatever the latest "stable" branch
> > is.
> >
> >
> > > His patch fixes my problem, but I don't know if Dimitry is waiting for
> > more opinions favourable before commit it.
> >
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > Thanks for testing, it is good to know that it works on real hardware!
> > I have only been able to test it on a virtualized environment myself...
> >
> > In any case, I am not a ports committer, so the maintainer(s) should
> > commit it, or give their approval for me to do so.
> >
> > -Dimitry
> >
> > Dimitry and Carlos,
> 
> Ports don't branch. They are only tagged at the points of FreeBSD releases,
> so all commits are to head. As a result, the term MFC is not appropriate.

oh, they do: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2014Q3/
and MFC (MFH) is appropriate.

> The patch simply needs to be committed to the tree. Since this port is
> maintained by x11@, this is the place to talk about it. But to get the
> patch committed, someone should open a bug at
> http://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla. Be sure to include the patch and report
> that it has been tested and buy whom..
> --
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
> E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-x11 at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"



More information about the freebsd-x11 mailing list