suspend/resume regression

Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com
Sat Jul 18 23:56:36 UTC 2015


Hold the phone! Just found a SATA drive. I will be installing HEAD on it
shortly. I won't update the ticket until I get that tested.

Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it works on HEAD. I suspended OK and tried to resume. The resume
> initiated and my screen came on... only to tell me that da0p2 was not
> available. I seem to recall that this was a known issue when running on a
> USB attached disk. The failure came much further along than on stable where
> it failed immediately with fans turning on, but nothing else happening,
> and, if I could connect the disk directly, I suspect it would work.
> Unfortunately, I don't have a spare SATA disk... only old PATA drives and
> the T520 only takes SATA drives.
>
> Bottom line is that the issue I saw with 10.1-STABLE and 10.1-BETA1 is not
> present on HEAD, so this is entirely a regression in STABLE.
>
> I will be updating to BETA2 shortly and I'll report how it works there.
>
> Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
> E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
> PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:07 PM, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 03:10:59 PM Brandon J.  Wandersee wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Please forgive me if this seems impudent, but has there been any
>>> progress on
>>> > this? The status of the bug report hasn't changed since it was opened.
>>> I
>>> > don't mean to be rude, and I certainly appreciate the effort that's
>>> gone
>>> > into this already (especially Kevin's detective work), but support for
>>> > suspend-to-RAM and my laptop's hotkeys were essentially the only
>>> reasons
>>> > I started tracking 10-STABLE to begin with. Since both features were
>>> > resolved many months ago, I was hoping to switch from -STABLE to
>>> 10.2-RELEASE
>>> > when it came out, but I'm starting to get the feeling that won't happen
>>> > because of a single errant commit. Having to continue following -STABLE
>>> > would not be terrible, but it would be disappointing.
>>>
>>> As noted previously, I have been moving house and generally offline since
>>> mid-June (and I'm not really fully online yet).  My last request was if
>>> Kevin (or someone else with an affected laptop) could test HEAD to see if
>>> there is a missing bugfix on HEAD that needs to be merged.  This specific
>>> change was tested on HEAD on both a T440 and X220 and on 10 to test the
>>> MFC on the T440.
>>>
>>> --
>>> John Baldwin
>>>
>>
>> John,
>>
>> I am back from my vacation and hope to try HEAD soon, hopefully this
>> weekend. Since HEAD has been a bit fragile of late, I do plan on testing
>> and switching back to STABLE. I will probably install HEAD on a spare
>> drive. With luck (meaning nothing crops up that fills the available time),
>> I should have an answer on Monday.
>>
>> Hope the move was not too chaotic and life gets back to normal quickly.
>> (I hate moving, but I do so twice a year. Practice makes something
>> approaching perfect.)
>> --
>> Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
>> E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
>> PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
>>
>
>


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list