Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP?
delphij at gmail.com
Sun Jul 12 08:56:38 UTC 2015
I've spent some time on the MFC, the testing would still take some time
(likely a day or two) and once that's finished I'll ask re@ for approval.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:44 PM Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon at dec.sakura.ne.jp>
> As I already mentioned in another post, head has 4.2.8 p3 in-tree.
> So the answer should be MFC before creation of releng/10.2 is planned
> or not.
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:04:43 +1000
> Peter Jeremy <peter at rulingia.com> wrote:
> > On 2015-Jul-11 23:22:56 -0400, Chris Nehren <
> cnehren+freebsd-stable at pobox.com> wrote:
> > >On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote:
> > >> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge.
> > >
> > >The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old / insecure
> > >/ otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from ports".
> > That's a non-answer. It just changes the question to "why bother to
> > include $bar in base when I need to install the port anyway".
> > --
> > Peter Jeremy
> Tomoaki AOKI junchoon at dec.sakura.ne.jp
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-stable