powerd and increase in energy need
Luigi Rizzo
rizzo at iet.unipi.it
Thu Mar 22 13:59:52 UTC 2012
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Alexander Leidinger <
Alexander at leidinger.net> wrote:
> Quoting Luigi Rizzo <rizzo at iet.unipi.it> (from Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:37:28
> +0100):
>
> I guess that the credit for power saving goes mostly to the CPU
>> architects. Powerd only gives second-order savings, and C1 vs. C3
>> is ineffective, at least for HZ=1000
>>
>> CPU Power (watts)
>> freq idle 16 threads
>> -----------------------
>> 200 48 51
>> 2200 52 83
>> 3200 54 115
>> 3401 56 118
>>
>> powerd 48 118
>>
>
> I hope you all don't use a cheap PSU, but a _good_ high efficient one,
> which really draws less power when idle instead of generating heat. Some
> PSUs are only efficient in a sweet spot, instead of being efficient over a
> broad range, even when being idle. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**
> 80_PLUS <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/80_PLUS> for a quick and not so
> in-deep overview (and the reality may differ from manufacturer to
> manufacturer).
>
it isn't such a big deal in my opinion. The %efficiency at low
levels is misleading if you don't factor out the 5-10W plateau for keeping
the
PSU alive (fan, ballast, etc.). See for instance
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Antec/HCG-520/5.html
the table at the end of the page reports 6.73W of idle power. At 40W
this PSU consumes 52.9W, so the apparent efficiency is 75%, but
factoring out the idle power you go way up.
cheers
luigi
--
> That does not compute.
>
> http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
> http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
>
>
--
-----------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Prof. Luigi RIZZO, rizzo at iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa
TEL +39-050-2211611 . via Diotisalvi 2
Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy)
-----------------------------------------+-------------------------------
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list