ZFS deadlock

[Jisakiel]

¿So no chances of ZFS stable on FBSD7? I was actually considering debian over freebsd on a dual AMD64, but if there are no settings that will make it stable... Nevertheless I'd be willing to help debugging ZFS on that machine (Dell T105) as soon as I receive it in a couple of weeks, as I'm in no rush to getting it into production (just tell me what to do ;) ).  

----- Mensaje original ----
De: Spike Ilacqua <spike at indra.com>
Para: Ender <ender at enderzone.com>
CC: freebsd-fs at freebsd.org; freebsd-stable at freebsd.org; Johan Ström <johan at headweb.com>
Enviado: martes, 8 de abril, 2008 18:13:32
Asunto: Re: ZFS deadlock

> Depending on  your work load you are just buying more time, so 
> "reasonable" is a matter of perspective. :(  I didn't see if you said 
> you are on 32bit or 64bit? Keep in mind the kmem max is 1.5-2G on amd64 
> regardless of how much memory you have. If 512M arcsize crashes too soon 
> for your tastes you can always lower it down to 256M, or 128M, etc.

I tried for several weeks to get ZFS stable on a 64bit system with a 
1.5G kernel.  The best uptime I ever got was 72 hours, the worst was 2, 
the average about 24.  Interestingly, most of the hangs were at off 
hours, when the system was lightly loaded, had lots of free memory, etc. 
  That suggests to me a slow leak of some sort.

Anyway, ZFS is not ready for production.  Some people may get lucky, but 
  you can't count on it.

Spike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"






      ______________________________________________ 
¿Con Mascota por primera vez? Sé un mejor Amigo. Entra en Yahoo! Respuestas http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome