ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
Mark Kirkwood
markir at paradise.net.nz
Sun Sep 10 19:07:47 PDT 2006
Karl Denninger wrote:
>
>
>
> No, I would like -STABLE to be treated as what it is claimed to be - BETA
> code, not ALPHA code.
>
> There's a huge difference between the two, and MFCing something back to
> -STABLE without testing the <BASIC> functionality of the module you're working
> with first does not fit the BETA model (it DOES fit the Alpha model.)
>
> This is coming from someone who has run FreeBSD in a production environment
> for basically 10 years, and has even sometimes used -CURRENT during that time
> (with full knowledge that running THAT is, indeed, ALPHA code!)
>
>
I guess part of the problem is not enough of us running -CURRENT, so
bugs can slip through into -STABLE via MFC (I know I'm guilty here - 2
boxes running -STABLE, none on -CURRENT....)
Cheers
Mark
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list