6.1-R ? 6-Stable ? 5.5-R ?

[Albert Shih]

 Le 09/06/2006 à 09:26:20+0200, Massimo Lusetti a écrit
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 09:09 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> 
> > No, I meant RELENG_6_1, which is the security fix branch
> > for 6.1-Release.  Albert wrote that he would prefer not
> > to use RELENG_6 (a.k.a. "6-stable") on a production machine,
> > therefore my recommendation is RELENG_6_1.
> 
> If read right he is already running a RELENG_6.

Well....yes but after many many crash during many mounth I've running a
Releng_6 (6 April 2006) and it's don't crash. And I don't have update.

Now the server crash yesterday (monday) and I'm asking if it's good idea to
update again. 
> 
> > Of course, there might be good reasons to run RELENG_6
> > anyway, in case that significant NFS fixes have gone in
> > after the release (which I'm not aware of).  But that
> > decision is up to Albert himself.
> 
> Actually if i remember right the NFS fix are gone in the RELENG_6 and
> not in RELENG_6_1

OK, that's mean if I update I need to update to RELENG_6 not RELENG_6_1.

Lots of thanks.

Regards.
--
Albert SHIH
Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT)
U.F.R. de Mathematiques.
7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10
Heure local/Local time:
Fri Jun 9 09:46:58 CEST 2006