5.3 STABLE for production server?
Ísak Ben.
isak at isak.is
Sat Dec 18 14:17:23 PST 2004
In my experience 5.3 is quite good for production and you should not be afraid to use it instead of 4.X
I have been running a few 5.3 boxes in production for a while without problems and im planning to replace
the rest of my servers with 5.3
--
Ísak Ben,
http://www.isak.is
---------- Original Message -----------
From: PawelG <pawel at mcmail.pl>
To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
Sent: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:08:55 +0100
Subject: 5.3 STABLE for production server?
> Hello,
>
> I've been using 4.X branch for production servers. Yesterday I bought
> box in datacenter with RAID 1 controller and operators in DC set up FreeBSD
> 5.X for me (instead 4.X i asked) because they have troubles with set up
> RAID controller runing on 4.X.
>
> I have two options:
>
> Posting with Datacenter and try to convince them to make RAID 1
> running on 4.X (I found on freebsd-hardware list that 3ware 7006-2
> controller runing fine).
>
> or
>
> Runing production server (Apache, Mysql, Postfix + ATA RAID 1) on 5.X.
>
> I would like to know your opinion about 5.3-STABLE for this
> pourpose. I googled some and found that it isn't good idea but all
> those opinions was pretty old (related for ex. to older BETA version
> of 5.X branch)
>
> kind regards,
>
> --
> Pawel
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
------- End of Original Message -------
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list