Firefox or what?
pathiaki2 at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 15 13:54:55 UTC 2019
I also, have no issues with .0 from FreeBSD.
I entirely ignore all Linux kernel major releases for at LEAST 6 months to get rid of the major issues.
Then I wait for the functional and security exploit patches for the next 2-4 years.
Again, calling a RELEASE a BETA without understanding the project, reading the release process and the release notes. Quite possibly, maybe you don't even understanding the difference of a BETA vs RC and the levels thereof.
Refusing to produce any documentation regarding the environment, the configuration, etc...
QA, TEST, RELEASE, BUG TRACKING are all handled in the traditional (aka the most painstaking manner of software engineering perfection) in the FreBSD project.
You refuse to read. You refuse to write. You point at irrelevant bugs.
Just a troll. However, the interesting this is you remind me almost identically of the same troll that shows up every 6 months on this list.
Anyhow, here's your information and I hope that the very helpful people on this list realize there are no problems here, just a consumption of resources.
DNS server handling your query: localhost
DNS server's address: 127.0.0.1#53
gc-24.de mail exchanger = 10 mail.gc-24.de.
origin = ns1.antagus.de
mail addr = root.ns1.antagus.de
serial = 1449586308
refresh = 10800
retry = 3600
expire = 604800
minimum = 3600
gc-24.de nameserver = ns1.antagus.de.
gc-24.de nameserver = ns2.antagus.de.
Authoritative answers can be found from:
On Thursday, August 15, 2019, 9:25:06 AM EDT, Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve at sohara.org> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:37:05 +0200
hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote:
> Then why doesn't the documentation warn about this? I was trying to
> find out what the recommended stable version is, and that seems to be
> 12 release. Why call it release when it's still beta?
It is a release, the first release in a major version that has
been through all the normal release engineering process with particular
care applied to new features and major rewrites as you would expect from
any well run release engineering team.
Many people prefer to avoid the first release in a major version of
*anything* because new features and major rewrites often have unexpected
side effects and bugs that don't come to light until after release.
FreeBSD historically (I've been using it since 1.1.5) has been
pretty good at .0 release (kudos to the release engineering teams - and
let us draw a kindly veil over 5.0) but nobody is perfect and expecting
the worst of .0 releases is sensible caution.
 There were good reasons this was a painful disaster.
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve at sohara.org>
freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions