foo; no such thing as a "dual-nic" atom firewall
kline at thought.org
Thu Nov 25 02:41:37 UTC 2010
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:14:01PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Gary Kline <kline at thought.org> wrote:
> > Anybody?
> Gary, in case you didn't catch it the pcengines link already given to you is
> low power setup with comsumption comparable or better than an Atom. It's
> also been tested with FreeBSD and pfSense according to the manufacturers
> site. There's nothing wrong with Atom, but different models have different
> chipsets/NIC's and there may be a possibility of unsupported hardware.
> Perhaps it might be easier for you to go with a known commodity.
> pfSense documentation is offered on their website as well as community
> support. I suggest you start there.
I forwarded the other model to my friend at the U and didn't
hear back. --Of course, for lots of the civilian class, it is
almost T'giving :-) Good thing there is ~three weeks left... .
> Adam Vande More
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Gary Kline kline at thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org
The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org
More information about the freebsd-questions