foo; no such thing as a "dual-nic" atom firewall

Adam Vande More amvandemore at
Thu Nov 25 02:14:03 UTC 2010

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Gary Kline <kline at> wrote:

>        Anybody?

Gary, in case you didn't catch it the pcengines link already given to you is
low power setup with comsumption comparable or better than an Atom.  It's
also been tested with FreeBSD and pfSense according to the manufacturers
site.  There's nothing wrong with Atom, but different models have different
chipsets/NIC's and there may be a possibility of unsupported hardware.
Perhaps it might be easier for you to go with a known commodity.

pfSense documentation is offered on their website as well as community
support.  I suggest you start there.

Adam Vande More

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list