Addition to BSDstats
Marc G. Fournier
scrappy at hub.org
Thu May 6 01:11:45 UTC 2010
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Hill wrote:
> Since we're on the topic, and in light of Fbsd1's recent adventure...
> Panama seems awfully high in the country stats. I understand what you
> said upthread about haproxy being in Panama, but it's a small country to
> be always at the top; maybe there's some way to differentiate between
> "really in Panama" and "don't know"? It also seems odd that I,
> personally, as a home user, should be responsible for about 3% of the
> bsdstats-reporting FreeBSD machines in the US. (3 hosts out of 101)
You will see those numbers dropping over the course of the month ... if
ppl out there are reading this and wish to help 'fix the numbers', just
run:
/usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics -nodelay
to update their records with the right country vs Panama, and you'll see
it change quickly ... you'll even notice that the overall numbers right
now are quick low, as I narrowed down the view to just 'so far this
month' to help bring down the Panama skew, so there is no overlap right
now with last month ...
The PC-BSD #s are the ones that really skew'd those numbers up though,
since theirs is auto-installed and always up to date, so unlike alot of
FBSD users that have old versions installed pointing directly to the
physical server, the PC-BSD ones were pointing to the load balancer ...
DNS will have to catch up for them ....
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy at hub.org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy at hub.org
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list