ehumphri at gmail.com
Mon Apr 28 03:12:38 UTC 2008
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Doug Hardie <bc979 at lafn.org> wrote:
> FreeBSD supports 3 firewalls: IPF, IPFW, and PF. Some time ago (perhaps
> years) I seem to recall some discussion that one or more of those was better
> maintained and higher quality than the others. I don't see any indications
> of this in the handbook. Several years ago I needed to do traffic shaping
> and used IPFW with dummynet. It worked but the need eventually went away.
> More recently I needed to incorporate spamd which defaults to PF so I used
> that. However, now I am back to needing traffic shaping again. I suspect
> trying to use both PF and IPFW simultaneously will not be a good approach.
> In addition, there now are instructions for using spamd with IPFW so it
> appears that either PF or IPFW will do what I need. Is there any additional
> information available to assist in selecting between those? Thanks.
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
PF supports traffic shaping via ALTQ.
More information about the freebsd-questions