nanobsd, picobsd, tinybsd
youshi10 at u.washington.edu
Sat Nov 10 14:11:48 PST 2007
John Smith wrote:
> I'd expected a more level headed reply from this FreeBSD list. How is
> a newbie supposed to know the differenced and how can I test this if I
> don't have a spare machine?
> My question was more out of interest. This mailing list is called
> FreeBSD-Questions, so why can't I asked a reasonable question and
> expect a reasonable reply...?
> On Nov 10, 2007 9:40 AM, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida at ceid.upatras.gr> wrote:
>> On 2007-11-09 17:01, John Smith <johnjgsmith at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Can anybody please explain to my what the differences are between
>>> nanobsd, picobsd and tinybsd.
>>> They all seem to be doing the same (creating a minimal FreeBSD image
>>> that can be used in embedded systems), or is this not right?
>> What don't you experiment with them, and see? :)
Please read the explanations on each page. You'll find that they differ
http://www.tinybsd.org/tinybsd -- TinyBSD (I emphasize the words
"tools", "scripts", "development", and "dynamically linked").
-- nanobsd (sounds like a complete, read-only system).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PicoBSD -- picobsd (obsolete; replaced by
nanobsd according to the Wiki page).
More information about the freebsd-questions