GTK vs QT

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Tue Feb 8 21:07:12 PST 2005


On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:53:55AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:29:53 -0800, Tabor Kelly
> <tkelly-freebsd-questions at taborandtashell.net> wrote:
> > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker <mwalker at codegurus.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back
> > >>it up?
> > >
> > >
> > > because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :)
> > >
> > > no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around
> > > on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so.
> > 
> > I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone
> > uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention
> > that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows.
> > 
> 
> i knew you where going to say that , let me fire some counter measures
> by saying that GTK2 + GIMP works excellent on windows XP

Gert, this list is for technical support questions about FreeBSD.  If
you want to have random discussions about other topics, the
appropriate list is freebsd-chat.

Thanks,
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050208/2a956279/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list