GTK vs QT

[Gert Cuykens]

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:07:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:53:55AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:29:53 -0800, Tabor Kelly
> > <tkelly-freebsd-questions at taborandtashell.net> wrote:
> > > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker <mwalker at codegurus.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back
> > > >>it up?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :)
> > > >
> > > > no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around
> > > > on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so.
> > >
> > > I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone
> > > uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention
> > > that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows.
> > >
> >
> > i knew you where going to say that , let me fire some counter measures
> > by saying that GTK2 + GIMP works excellent on windows XP
> 
> Gert, this list is for technical support questions about FreeBSD.  If
> you want to have random discussions about other topics, the
> appropriate list is freebsd-chat.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kris
> 

ok