GTK vs QT
gert.cuykens at gmail.com
Tue Feb 8 20:53:56 PST 2005
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:29:53 -0800, Tabor Kelly
<tkelly-freebsd-questions at taborandtashell.net> wrote:
> Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker <mwalker at codegurus.org> wrote:
> >>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back
> >>it up?
> > because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :)
> > no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around
> > on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so.
> I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone
> uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention
> that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows.
i knew you where going to say that , let me fire some counter measures
by saying that GTK2 + GIMP works excellent on windows XP
More information about the freebsd-questions