Reorganization of the py-sqlalchemy ports
FreeBSD at ShaneWare.Biz
Fri May 20 05:00:51 UTC 2016
On 19/05/2016 16:55, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 18/05/2016 23:04, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
>>> I'm proposing the following:
>>>> py-sqlalchemy06 0.6.9 nivit at FreeBSD.org (Deprecate 2016-08-20)
>>>> py-sqlalchemy07 0.7.10 nivit at FreeBSD.org (Deprecate 2016-08-20)
>>>> py-sqlalchemy08 0.8.7 nivit at FreeBSD.org
>>>> py-sqlalchemy09 0.9.10 m.tsatsenko at gmail.com
>>>> py-sqlalchemy10 1.0.13 m.tsatsenko at gmail.com
>> I wonder, why to create as many SQLAlchemy ports as releases (it's just an ORM after all).
>> The easiest way, imho is focusing on 1.0.x releases, and having only one port databases/py-sqlalchemy.
> This is the conservative approach. It may well be the case that
> everything that depends on sqlalchemy can perfectly well just use the
> latest version, in which case the number of ports can be reduced.
> However we don't know how compatible the different versions are yet, and
> it will take some time and experimentation to work it out. In the mean
> time, having this many ports will provide some assurance of compatibility.
Personally I am just starting to look at sqlalchemy so can't comment on
the compatibility between versions.
Having a look at bsdstats.org they show port install numbers of
It may be worth considering keeping 0.6 for compatibility and drop 0.7,
As we currently have 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 I would skip adding 0.9 and just
FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing
More information about the freebsd-ports