portsnap - overwrite local changes
mad at madpilot.net
Tue Jan 22 13:19:26 UTC 2013
On 01/22/13 14:00, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Guido Falsi <mad at madpilot.net> wrote:
>> If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you
>> could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to
>> keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and
>> revert your modifications using it, which can be quite handy.
>> Disvantage is you will sometime need to merge conflicts which could
>> require you to study subversion more than what you really want.
> Ok, subversion came also to my mind but I guess portsnap is faster then
> svn is. The thing with svn is, that I would always need to examine the
> logs if there where conflicts generated.
> I don't want to keep my local changes. I would like to have command
> which just gets me a 1:1 copy of the "current" ports tree and deletes
> or overwrites my local changes. There is nothing I want to get merged.
Ok, I misunderstood your problem then.
I think your best bet is deleting the old tree and extracting it again
with portsnap, this would not be very fast though.
If you use zfs you could leverage it, using snapshots and clones. You
could snapshot the official tree, clone it, modify the cloned one(munted
in /usr/ports) and when you upgrade destroy the clone and create a new
clone from the updated official tree, which would be clean without local
subversion could help too. You could perform a "svn revert -R ."
followed by svn up. This would be faster than "rm -r * && portsnap
extract" (done in /usr/ports, obviously)
Guido Falsi <mad at madpilot.net>
More information about the freebsd-ports