LibH or Anaconda ??

[David Johnson]

On Sunday 23 May 2004 08:52 pm, =D0=A1 =B7=C9=E7=E7 wrote:

>   So , why don't you guys to think about migration rather than
> rewriting a completely
> different architecture for the installer ?

Anaconda is certainly an option, but I doubt a binary-only Anaconda is.=20
Think about it. We need to go beyond running Redhat's  installer in=20
Linux compatibility mode. Also. SuSE just open sourced their YaST=20
installer. That's an option as well.

=2D-=20
David Johnson
___________________
http://www.usermode.org