Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?

Brooks Davis brooks at
Sun Jul 3 01:02:24 GMT 2005

On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 02:09:11AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
> >>>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:14:20 -0700
> >>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks at> said:
> brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a
> brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually
> brooks> work with.  A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the
> brooks> best approach.
> I believe KAME doesn't use non standard struct such as sock_union.

Oops, you are correct, it's part of fastipsec, not KAME.

-- Brooks

Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list