Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
brooks at one-eyed-alien.net
Sun Jul 3 01:02:24 GMT 2005
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 02:09:11AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:14:20 -0700
> >>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks at one-eyed-alien.net> said:
> brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a
> brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually
> brooks> work with. A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the
> brooks> best approach.
> I believe KAME doesn't use non standard struct such as sock_union.
Oops, you are correct, it's part of fastipsec, not KAME.
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20050703/364fe512/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-hackers