gtk port breakage

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:03:08PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 20:58, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:26:41 -0700, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm not going to report further gtk build failures because there are
> > > too many of them..check bento's i386 builds for lists of broken ports
> > > if you're interested.
> > 
> > How would you, FreeBSD GNOME team, like us to do if we want to help? Send 
> > patch to PR and contract to the maintainers or go ahead send to 
> > gnome at FreeBSD.org and will get commit right away?
> 
> This kind of thing should be handled by individual port maintainers. 
> I've added a CHANGES entry so porters know that there was a change, and
> how to correct it.  I've taken care of the last few gnome@ ports that
> are broken.
> 
> If anyone needs help fixing these problems, gnome@ will be happy to
> offer advice on a case-by-case basis.  For now, if you use an affected
> port, send a patch to the maintainer.

Hopefully the rest will be marked BROKEN soon so that they stop
spamming me :)

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040410/9fc8f2dd/attachment.bin