gtk port breakage

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 20:58, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:26:41 -0700, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> > I'm not going to report further gtk build failures because there are
> > too many of them..check bento's i386 builds for lists of broken ports
> > if you're interested.
> 
> How would you, FreeBSD GNOME team, like us to do if we want to help? Send 
> patch to PR and contract to the maintainers or go ahead send to 
> gnome at FreeBSD.org and will get commit right away?

This kind of thing should be handled by individual port maintainers. 
I've added a CHANGES entry so porters know that there was a change, and
how to correct it.  I've taken care of the last few gnome@ ports that
are broken.

If anyone needs help fixing these problems, gnome@ will be happy to
offer advice on a case-by-case basis.  For now, if you use an affected
port, send a patch to the maintainer.

Joe

> 
> Cheers,
> Mezz
> 
> > Kris
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040410/bb33adf6/attachment.bin