bin/72138: libc.so.5 isn't installed in a safe way
ru at freebsd.org
Tue Sep 28 10:40:13 PDT 2004
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:35:37PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> So I personally prefer we have -S for the shared libraries (as Ruslan's
> patch did) - and give our user community the choose of whether to have
> INSTALL=install -S in their make.conf.
> What do you think about this?
My patch does this for "precious" shared libraries. And yes, putting
"INSTALL=install -S" is what I had in mind when suggesting to test
ru at FreeBSD.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040928/d737288f/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current