bin/72138: libc.so.5 isn't installed in a safe way
ru at freebsd.org
Tue Sep 28 10:40:02 PDT 2004
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:05:11PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Xin LI <delphij at frontfree.net> writes:
> > So I personally prefer we have -S for the shared libraries (as Ruslan's
> > patch did) - and give our user community the choose of whether to have
> > INSTALL=install -S in their make.conf.
> > What do you think about this?
> It is important that a failing "make installworld" doesn't leave a
> non-working system behind. I don't care much about temporary files left
It's rather impossible to guarantee, but we do our best (by first
installing libraries, then binaries, etc.).
ru at FreeBSD.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040928/b5b6de4d/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current