Status reports - why not regularly?

[Kirill Ponomarew]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> "Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona at theatre.msu.edu> wrote:
> > 1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and 
> > therefore dropped immediatally.  this sort of report is handled 
> > wonderfully by dan @ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate 
> > what he has done
> why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area
> should be covered here too. 

As Jonathan said, the freshports is the best site where you can
get all issues about it.

-Kirill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040113/dd6fde6d/attachment.bin