Status reports - why not regularly?

Josef El-Rayes josef at
Tue Jan 13 10:19:01 PST 2004

"Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona at> wrote:
> 1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and 
> therefore dropped immediatally.  this sort of report is handled 
> wonderfully by dan @ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate 
> what he has done
why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area
should be covered here too. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 479 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list