Status reports - why not regularly?
josef at daemon.li
Tue Jan 13 10:19:01 PST 2004
"Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona at theatre.msu.edu> wrote:
> 1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and
> therefore dropped immediatally. this sort of report is handled
> wonderfully by dan @ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate
> what he has done
why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area
should be covered here too.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 479 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040113/24facaf6/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current