Status reports - why not regularly?

[Jonathan T. Sage]

Kirill Ponomarew wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> 
>>"Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona at theatre.msu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and 
>>>therefore dropped immediatally.  this sort of report is handled 
>>>wonderfully by dan @ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate 
>>>what he has done
>>
>>why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area
>>should be covered here too. 
> 
> 
> As Jonathan said, the freshports is the best site where you can
> get all issues about it.
> 
> -Kirill
Exactally, and as Mark pointed out, I think that keeping in changes to 
the ports infrastructure (bsd.ports.mk) would be an excellent idea.

~j


-- 
"Yesterday upon the stair I saw a man
who wasn't there, he wasn't there
again today, oh how i wish he'd go away"

Rev. Jonathan T. Sage
Lighting / Set Designer
Professional Web Design

[HTTP://theatre.msu.edu]
[sagejona at theatre.msu.edu]
[See Headers for Contact Info]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040113/8df9eeee/attachment.bin