/rescue

[M. Warner Losh]

In message: <20030508172326.GP76376 at roark.gnf.org>
            Gordon Tetlow <gordont at gnf.org> writes:
: On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:08:58AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20030508165844.GO76376 at roark.gnf.org>
: >             Gordon Tetlow <gordont at gnf.org> writes:
: > : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:39:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > : > 
: > : > Tim posted this a while ago to hackers at .  It looked like it was
: > : > further along than what's been posted here.
: > : 
: > : Actually, Tim's and my work are complimentary. I hadn't worked on
: > : getting a /rescue, /stand, /ohcrap directory. Personally, I agree
: > : with David O'Brien that it should be called /stand since we have
: > : precedence (and documentation in hier(7)) for that.
: > 
: > NetBSD put them in /rescue.  /stand has been phased out over the past
: > few years.  There's precident many ways.  Can we please not argue of
: > stupid shit like this?  That's why we get into these damn bikesheds.
: 
: Bikeshed? I wouldn't call it a bikeshed yet, and let's not get to that
: point if we can avoid it. If we want a clean break, so be it. I don't
: particularly care one way or the other. I just expressed my preference.

I guess the recent name hiding thread has gotten my bikeshed trigger
on 'hair' no.

Warner