/rescue

Gordon Tetlow gordont at gnf.org
Thu May 8 10:23:28 PDT 2003


On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:08:58AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20030508165844.GO76376 at roark.gnf.org>
>             Gordon Tetlow <gordont at gnf.org> writes:
> : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:39:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > 
> : > Tim posted this a while ago to hackers at .  It looked like it was
> : > further along than what's been posted here.
> : 
> : Actually, Tim's and my work are complimentary. I hadn't worked on
> : getting a /rescue, /stand, /ohcrap directory. Personally, I agree
> : with David O'Brien that it should be called /stand since we have
> : precedence (and documentation in hier(7)) for that.
> 
> NetBSD put them in /rescue.  /stand has been phased out over the past
> few years.  There's precident many ways.  Can we please not argue of
> stupid shit like this?  That's why we get into these damn bikesheds.

Bikeshed? I wouldn't call it a bikeshed yet, and let's not get to that
point if we can avoid it. If we want a clean break, so be it. I don't
particularly care one way or the other. I just expressed my preference.

-gordon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20030508/b62ec114/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list