/rescue

[Wilko Bulte]

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:25:26AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20030508172326.GP76376 at roark.gnf.org>
>             Gordon Tetlow <gordont at gnf.org> writes:
> : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:08:58AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <20030508165844.GO76376 at roark.gnf.org>
> : >             Gordon Tetlow <gordont at gnf.org> writes:
> : > : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:39:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > : > 
> : > : > Tim posted this a while ago to hackers at .  It looked like it was
> : > : > further along than what's been posted here.
> : > : 
> : > : Actually, Tim's and my work are complimentary. I hadn't worked on
> : > : getting a /rescue, /stand, /ohcrap directory. Personally, I agree
> : > : with David O'Brien that it should be called /stand since we have
> : > : precedence (and documentation in hier(7)) for that.
> : > 
> : > NetBSD put them in /rescue.  /stand has been phased out over the past
> : > few years.  There's precident many ways.  Can we please not argue of
> : > stupid shit like this?  That's why we get into these damn bikesheds.
> : 
> : Bikeshed? I wouldn't call it a bikeshed yet, and let's not get to that
> : point if we can avoid it. If we want a clean break, so be it. I don't
> : particularly care one way or the other. I just expressed my preference.
> 
> I guess the recent name hiding thread has gotten my bikeshed trigger
> on 'hair' no.

Lets put everything in /bikeshed and be done with it.

-- 
|   / o / /_  _   		wilko at FreeBSD.org
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte