Re: llvm/clang upstream
- In reply to: Michał_Górny : "Re: llvm/clang upstream"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:45:41 UTC
On 2021-11-30 12:37, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 12:08 +0100, Floyd, Paul wrote: >> Not sure where the best place is to ask this. >> >> Any ideas why llvm seems so incredibly slow in taking FreeBSD patches? >> >> It would be nice to be able to just 'git clone && cmake && make' >> (roughly speaking). > In my opinion, LLVM is an overgrown project whose organization structure > didn't follow. I don't know about FreeBSD patches specifically > but in general the hardest part is finding someone to approve your > patch. Many patches rot without a single reply from anyone, and I think > the whole process discourages people from trying. That makes some sense. The main backers (Apple and Google) have their own agendas, and are mainly interested in macOS/iOS and Android. I have seen some effort to free up llvm recently though, they are migrating their bug database from bugzilla to github. When that's done I'll try to see if I can find any FreeBSD patch requests, and see if poking them makes anything move. A+ Paul