Re: Benchmarks: FreeBSD 13 vs. NetBSD 9.2 vs. OpenBSD 7 vs. DragonFlyBSD 6 vs. Linux

Hi,
I see these claims over and over.
So I must ask.
Is there any tunibg guide(s) to make the default not conservative in a
regrding to several use cases like using as web server? How to Utilize gpu
maybe?
I know there are few network (aka routing / forwarding) guides.. but maybe
instead of that superior feeling "oh they are linuxish and knoe shit" maybe
better supply the tuning needed to get better results?
And I'm not talking to get an engineer to analyze the tests case..
Maybe the linux defaults fit better for most use cases rather than being
conservative??

Just to be clear I almost not used linux and always freebsd for simplicity
usage..  but I must say it makes me wonder

Sami

בתאריך שבת, 11 בדצמ׳ 2021, 11:52, מאת beepc.ch ‏<xpetrl@beepc.ch>:

> > I am surprised to see that the BSD cluster today has much worse
> performance
> > than Linux.
> > What do you think of this?
>
> "Default" FreeBSD install setting are quite conservative.
> The Linux common distros are high tuned, those benchmark is in my
> opinion comparison of apples and oranges.
>
> Comparing "default" FreeBSD install with "default" Slackware install
> would be more interesting, because Slackware builds are at most vanilla.
>
>