r548950: graphics/mesa-libs vs. x11/nvidia-driver??!?

[Alex V. Petrov]

On 19.09.2020 18:13, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r548950 | manu | 2020-09-19 02:34:36 -0700 (Sat, 19 Sep 2020) | 9 lines
> 
> mesa-libs: Add glesv1 lib
> 
> There is no real reason to disable glesv1 so add it to the build.
> While here add a USE_GL for it.
> 
> Reviewed by:    zeising
> Approved by:    x11 (zeising@)
> Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26461
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> g1-48(12.2-S)[4] pkg which  /usr/local/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so
> /usr/local/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so was installed by package nvidia-driver-440.100
> 
> So when graphics/mesa-libs is updated to r548950, it builds & stages
> OK, but:
> 
> ===>  Installing for mesa-libs-19.0.8_3
> ===>   Registering installation for mesa-libs-19.0.8_3 as automatic
> Installing mesa-libs-19.0.8_3...
> pkg-static: mesa-libs-19.0.8_3 conflicts with nvidia-driver-440.100 (installs files into the same place).  Problematic file: /usr/local/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so
> *** Error code 70
> 
> How should this be resolved?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Peace,
> david
> 

I have the same problem.

-- 
-----
Alex.