r548950: graphics/mesa-libs vs. x11/nvidia-driver??!?

[David Wolfskill]

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r548950 | manu | 2020-09-19 02:34:36 -0700 (Sat, 19 Sep 2020) | 9 lines

mesa-libs: Add glesv1 lib

There is no real reason to disable glesv1 so add it to the build.
While here add a USE_GL for it.

Reviewed by:    zeising
Approved by:    x11 (zeising@)
Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26461

------------------------------------------------------------------------

g1-48(12.2-S)[4] pkg which  /usr/local/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so
/usr/local/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so was installed by package nvidia-driver-440.100

So when graphics/mesa-libs is updated to r548950, it builds & stages
OK, but:

===>  Installing for mesa-libs-19.0.8_3
===>   Registering installation for mesa-libs-19.0.8_3 as automatic
Installing mesa-libs-19.0.8_3...
pkg-static: mesa-libs-19.0.8_3 conflicts with nvidia-driver-440.100 (installs files into the same place).  Problematic file: /usr/local/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so
*** Error code 70

How should this be resolved?

Thanks.

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david at catwhisker.org
"President Trump can say whatever he likes, but his actions speak for
themselves." -- Dan Berschinski, wounded US Army veteran

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20200919/6b36ebb0/attachment.sig>