r548950: graphics/mesa-libs vs. x11/nvidia-driver??!?

[Niclas Zeising]

On 2020-09-20 17:24, Alex V. Petrov wrote:
> On 19.09.2020 18:13, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r548950 | manu | 2020-09-19 02:34:36 -0700 (Sat, 19 Sep 2020) | 9 lines
>>
>> mesa-libs: Add glesv1 lib
>>
>> There is no real reason to disable glesv1 so add it to the build.
>> While here add a USE_GL for it.
>>
>> Reviewed by:    zeising
>> Approved by:    x11 (zeising@)
>> Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26461
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> g1-48(12.2-S)[4] pkg which  /usr/local/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so
>> /usr/local/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so was installed by package nvidia-driver-440.100
>>
>> So when graphics/mesa-libs is updated to r548950, it builds & stages
>> OK, but:
>>
>> ===>  Installing for mesa-libs-19.0.8_3
>> ===>   Registering installation for mesa-libs-19.0.8_3 as automatic
>> Installing mesa-libs-19.0.8_3...
>> pkg-static: mesa-libs-19.0.8_3 conflicts with nvidia-driver-440.100 (installs files into the same place).  Problematic file: /usr/local/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so
>> *** Error code 70
>>
>> How should this be resolved?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Peace,
>> david
>>
> 
> I have the same problem.
> 

See the PR below for patches.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249448
Regards
-- 
Niclas