Help needed: ports builds on 10.X but breaks on 9.X

[A.J. "Fonz" van Werven]

Kubilay Kocak wrote:

> The real question that informs the decision is: Might/Do the people
> using the quarterly want/need this?
[snip]
> A really way to get a better feel is to browse the quarterly commit log:
> 
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2015Q4/?view=log
> 
> However,  if you're unsure, it's appropriate to set the merge-quarterly
> flag to ? *any time* you think that (or are not entirely sure whether) a
> change/issue may need to be committed to quarterly. Really.
> 
> We'd rather quarterly become high value and deal with a few more issues
> that have the flag incorrectly set (and deny the request), than missing
> commits/fixes that go into head that should be merged, but aren't.

Thanks a bunch, it looks pretty clear to me.

AvW

-- 
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20151027/316f5171/attachment.bin>